While a catastrophic tsunami or earthquake is something no country wants to experience, these sorts of natural disasters are eventuallities which Chileans have some provisions for.
I have visited Chile on two occasions and was told in Santiago back in 2004 that a big earthquake in the region was overdue.
The last one they experienced measured over 9 on the Richter Scale. It was the biggest quake on record in the world.
When I visited in 2008, I noticed on almost every street corner of one of the northern Chilean coastal towns, Tsumani warning signs with arrows pointing to higher ground.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmD_es1-o0hyphenhyphen8-u74TEPSS1PVSrw0H-54we-HRv5mSev7R5zgZaGFW3ZPSGuH88XY7gT0xhAbBF7cGIymobuTwghPbOmwEoGyquWeSzU6-kVRWl2KTq4O3YkT9grt3UPu8fpcE/s400/Rcd+2008,+South+America,+Panama,+Costa+Rica,+Florida+%26+sea+086.jpg)
Why is it then that warnings on Australian beaches go unheeded by some brave/foolish beachgoers?
The cost of installing these systems must be enormous but some folk treat the early warnings almost as a joke. And some are disappointed if they do not see the catastrophic tsunami wave.
This is the second quake in a short period of time (Haiti only a few weeks ago). Obviously some of the tectonic plates are on the move?
The big question is - is California due for the big one?
I've never been to Califormia (apart from changing planes in LA) but I doubt they have warning signs on the street corners - and if they do, will people take heed of them when the sirens sound?
1 comment:
Post a Comment